Viacom Sues YouTube for $1 Billion…The End of the Tube?
Category Video, internet, Web2.0, Business | Permalink | 13. March 2007
« Bands blossom at eclectic SXSW | Prime Minister’s Questions Moves Online With MSN Messenger »
Well, it happened. YouTube is facing a $1 billion+ lawsuit from Viacom today. It was known that YouTube would eventually face at least one major lawsuit, and Viacom - which had already pulled 100,000 clips from the site, was perhaps the most likely to take a distaste to the company
.
Viacom is accusing YouTube of “massive intentional copyright infringement”, saying that 160,000 unauthorized Viacom clips have been uploaded onto YouTube, totaling more than 1.5 billion views. In truth, the “more than $1 billion” figure sounds a little low: typically these companies seek the maximum sum of $150,000 per infringement. This was the case with Bolt.com, which decided to settle for $10 million rather than endure a lengthy legal battle against Universal.
Viacom, owner of MTV and Nickelodeon, put out a release regarding the YouTube case today, with the following statement:
There is no question that YouTube and Google are continuing to take the fruit of our efforts without permission and destroying enormous value in the process. This is value that rightfully belongs to the writers, directors and talent who create it and companies like Viacom that have invested to make possible this innovation and creativity.
So this is the ultimate showdown: a test whether you can “pull a YouTube” and get away with it. YouTube, frankly, has moved the video market forward faster than any other player, and that high risk game is ultimately good for users. If it had been left to Viacom and its ilk to move forward with Internet TV, we’d still be watching everything in Windows Media or Realplayer format, with no progress made over the past two years. These companies didn’t innovate, and suddenly found themselves contending with a young upstart that was driving more viewers to their content than they ever could. Fearing loss of control, particularly of the distribution channel, suing seemed like the best option for a company that’s anti-innovation. That said, YouTube was also so incredibly slow to roll out its copy protection, and only delivered a deal with AudibleMagic when we expected an in-house solution, that it gave these lawsuits the opportunity to bubble up.,
313 ReadRelated Posts
- YouTube jilted, Joost is Viacom’s new BFF Not two weeks after Viacom served YouTube with a major smackdown, Viacom has announced it is gettin...
- Amy Fisher Sues over Sex Tape - TMZ.com From the TMZ page : TMZ has obtained the lawsuit filed by Amy Fisher in New York Federal Court, ...
- Luke Johnson Phone Experiment Goes National on CNN In my down time, watching You Tube videos is one of my favorite ways to relax and kill some time...
- How To Download And Convert YouTube Videos For iTunes or iPod The easiest way to download videos from YouTube I think is to use one of available free software...
- Google’s Schmidt in YouTube copyright pledge With a view to halting the plethora of copyright cases and complaints brought against YouTube, Goog...
- Quality: BBC and YouTube in bed together New BBC branded ‘channels’ are set to appear on YouTube following the announcement of a deal...
- Gmail Shines In Googler Video Where does a major Internet company with a $143 billion market cap and millions of dollars in ca...
- G8 pledges $60 bln to fight disease in Africa, boosts aid The Group of Eight wealthiest nations on Friday pledged 60 billion dollars to fight AIDS and malaria...
- Maybe Google Wanted to be Sued: YouTube and Plan B No matter how you spun it, a lawsuit was waiting to pounce on YouTube. And when the lawsuit came, it...
- Mininova Breaks 3 Billion Downloads Barrier Mininova reached another milestone as they just passed the 3 billion torrent download mark. The impr...


































































