The 9/11 conspiracy theories are pretty well known by now. The BBC addressed them earlier this month with a documentary, The Conspiracy Files, shown within the UK.

Until now, I don’t think we’ve been accused of being part of the conspiracy. But now some websites are using news footage from BBC World on September 11th 2001 to suggest we were actively participating in some sort of attempt to manipulate the audience. As a result, we’re now getting lots of emails asking us to clarify our position. So here goes:

1. We’re not part of a conspiracy. Nobody told us what to say or do on September 11th. We didn’t get told in advance that buildings were going to fall down. We didn’t receive press releases or scripts in advance of events happening.

2. In the chaos and confusion of the day, I’m quite sure we said things which turned out to be untrue or inaccurate - but at the time were based on the best information we had. We did what we always did - sourced our reports, used qualifying words like “apparently” or “it’s reported” or “we’re hearing” and constantly tried to check and double check the information we were receiving.

3. Our reporter Jane Standley was in New York on the day of the attacks, and like everyone who was there, has the events seared on her mind. I’ve spoken to her today and unsurprisingly, she doesn’t remember minute-by-minute what she said or did - like everybody else that day she was trying to make sense of what she was seeing; what she was being told; and what was being told to her by colleagues in London who were monitoring feeds and wires services.,

4. We no longer have the original tapes of our 9/11 coverage (for reasons of cock-up, not conspiracy). So if someone has got a recording of our output, I’d love to get hold of it. We do have the tapes for our sister channel News 24, but they don’t help clear up the issue one way or another.

5. If we reported the building had collapsed before it had done so, it would have been an error - no more than that. As one of the comments on You Tube says today “so the guy in the studio didn’t quite know what was going on? Woah, that totally proves conspiracy… “

Original News :

http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theeditors/2007/02/part_of_the_conspiracy.html

Related Posts

• Internet Security for Web 2.0 Applications Video
The arrival of the Web 2.0 world has brought with it a universe of new ways to stay connected wi...
• Dangling some ‘evidence’ that Saddam is still alive
Saddam Hussein is "alive and well" - or so says an agent selling what he purports is "forensic evide...
• Wordpress 2400 Theme pack 1
We made 2400 wordpress theme for you.you can download the best themes of the packet once time in...
• Octopart - search engine for electronic parts
There's a new chip/part search engine called "Octopart" on the block, check it out and post up ...
• Google Local Squeezes Online Directories
The $39 billion worth of Yellow Pages and Local Search and Directories advertising forecast for ...
• SXSW: Publishers, Where are You?
On a private mailing list for publishers, Peter Brantley pointed to Booksquare's open letter to publ...
• American Idol Gay Question
American Idol knows they are going to have to work hard to keep viewers with this batch of singe...
• Heart parts from stem cells could be reality in 3 years
A BRITISH research team led by a world-renowned heart surgeon has grown part of a human heart from s...
• WP OpenAds Wordpress Plugin
I am extremely pleased to announce the beta release WP OpenAds today. WP OpenAds is a Wordpress Plug...
• Nike SB x Vanilla Ice Blazer
As part of the "Fallen Heroes" pack, Nike SB will release a Blazer, represeting Vanilla Ice. The sne...