“What do you want?” Dell asked its users. “Linux on our desks and in our laps, please,” they replied. “We hear you,” said Dell, “but we don’t want to disappoint you, so you can’t have it just yet.” Sadly, the users are disappointed anyway.

Dell says that it’ll certify some desktop and laptop hardware for Novell SuSE Linux, but mostly it wants to wait and see. When the market decides on the best Linux distribution, Dell will commit — in other words, it will hang about until the winner is popular enough to be self-supporting. This is in keeping with the old Dell, the company that has been proud to “leverage the R&D spend of the industry”, a lightly-disguised way of saying, “You make it work, and we’ll take it when the dust has settled.” It is also in keeping with the reactive timidity that has seen the company lose ground that once seemed its by divine right.

Support is Dell’s bugbear. It is intent on controlling costs by cutting service to the point of pain. By seeing Linux as a problem requiring extra support, the company is once again thinking in old-fashioned terms. It has another option, one that matches the new reality of low cost hardware, cheap bandwidth and software trends.

Nobody has yet created an OEM-friendly distribution of Linux, designed to minimise support costs by simplifying usage and minimising complexity. The beauty of open source software is that such an operating system can be created almost as fast as it is specified. It can look good, it can work fast, it can be fully interoperable with Microsoft file formats and industry standard data types, and it can ship as a baseline product. With so much functionality now on the web, the idea of the information appliance is back — and this time, it makes sense.

Once upon a time, someone else had the same idea: a radically simple computer that threw away the complexities of the old, used powerful new ideas for simplicty, and just worked. It was called the Mac and it gave users freedom. Those ideals have been lost in the converging world of over-complex, expensive and bloated software. If it would listen to its users, Dell would hear the same desires. It has the opportunity to make the Macintosh for the rest of us — and, more importantly, for itself.

Original News:

http://opinion.zdnet.co.uk/leader/0,1000002208,39286126,00.htm

Related Posts

• How does FreeBSD differ from Linux?
I run FreeBSD on my computers. A lot of my friends run Linux, or at least one of the distributions...
• Russian schools move to Linux
Schoolchildren in Russia are to be taught using the free, open-source Linux software in an effort to...
• BZFlag is a free online multiplayer Linux Game
BZFlag is a free online multiplayer cross-platform open source 3D tank battle game. The na...
• Linux Game Armagetron Advanced
Linux Armagetron is a multiplayer game in 3d that attempts to emulate and expand on the lightcyc...
• Ubuntu guy has a Dell logo on his T-Shirt
Anyone notice that the Ubuntu guy has a Dell logo on his T-Shirt? Wow! Comment : I care about...
• Linux : uClinux on the PSP
Chris got linux on his PSP, here's the page with downloads and more-- Linux on the PSP! Currently...
• Multiplayer Paint Similar to games like iSketch
This is a very minimalistic Java applet that is similar to games like iSketch or InkLink, but wi...
• Kernel Comparison Linux vs Windows
Kernel Comparison: Linux (2.6.20) versus Windows (Vista) News From 18-23 April 2007 this compari...
• Linux Screenshots Museum From 1998
Taken 19 September 1998. Netscape is viewing a webpage from the web server Apache on the localho...
• Flyback Towards a Time Machine Clone for Linux
Some members of the Open Source community have taken such a shine to Time Machine, they have been wo...